advertisement

Article:
  Confident Apple for 2004
Subject:   Analogies considered harmful
Date:   2004-01-10 07:07:42
From:   anonymous2
Response to: Analogies considered harmful

For the record I don't read slashdot or do drugs. But I like the analogy.


You make a good point about ATM's being consumable products and pointing out the difference in regards to the iApps. I can't argue with your logic on that point. I also have no problem with them charging for GarageBand and the iDVD upgrade.


My complaint lies in that I received free upgrades with the last release of iMovie and iPhoto. I was also under the impression that the products were a part of the OS, not a separate application that was given away for free. You couldn't buy the iApps separately when they were released, they were a part of every Mac. I get free upgrades for Jaguar, why not expect free upgrades for other applications that I was led to believe where a part of Jaguar.


The short point is that if the iApps where sold as a free add-on with the purchase of a Mac then I wouldn't expect free upgrades. They were sold as a part of the Mac and removing functionality in order to charge for it is where my complaint lies.


Are they going to start charging 19.99 for Safari?

Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • Analogies considered harmful
    2004-01-12 20:47:06  anonymous2 [Reply | View]

    gawd- if they charged 19.99 for safari, i'd have to dust off the Camino app.