For the record I don't read slashdot or do drugs. But I like the analogy.
You make a good point about ATM's being consumable products and pointing out the difference in regards to the iApps. I can't argue with your logic on that point. I also have no problem with them charging for GarageBand and the iDVD upgrade.
My complaint lies in that I received free upgrades with the last release of iMovie and iPhoto. I was also under the impression that the products were a part of the OS, not a separate application that was given away for free. You couldn't buy the iApps separately when they were released, they were a part of every Mac. I get free upgrades for Jaguar, why not expect free upgrades for other applications that I was led to believe where a part of Jaguar.
The short point is that if the iApps where sold as a free add-on with the purchase of a Mac then I wouldn't expect free upgrades. They were sold as a part of the Mac and removing functionality in order to charge for it is where my complaint lies.
Are they going to start charging 19.99 for Safari?
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
Analogies considered harmful
2004-01-12 20:47:06
anonymous2
[Reply | View]
gawd- if they charged 19.99 for safari, i'd have to dust off the Camino app.