I hoped to amplify the comments of Richard by suggesting LINUX because its not really hard to setup, contrary to common opinion, FUD, 'the experts', etc., and does not cost anything for a LINUX license.

I don't think we can assume anything about Chad's environment from his post. I might have been more serious about my post if Chad had mentioned what version, workstation or server, of Windows, e.g. 98, XP, NT4, W2K Server/AS, W2003/32, W2003/64, etc..

Sorry if I offended anyone.