| Sign In/My Account | View Cart |
| Weblog: | To push desktop Linux, radical shift may be required | |
| Subject: | Individual Application Installation | |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 23:12:47 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
| Being one of those users that constantly flip-flops between linux and windows. I can honestly say that the only real stmbling block left for the average joe is the installation of applications. I really want to switch and stick with linux, but. as bad as "dll hell" (witch isn't really even an issue in recent years) is, the dependancy problem in linux is far and away a worse problem. Not to mention compiling. RPM is a step in the right direction, but you still ahve the dependency problem. What linux needs is a standard set of libraries, and if a library is needed that's not in the standard base, it should be included in the application installation. I'm often surprised how often the OS installation is brought up as a problem, but never individual apps. | ||
Showing messages 1 through 5 of 5.
| Showing messages 1 through 5 of 5. |
It's still not great, but it's no longer nearly as severe a problem as it was. My advice is to use a distro that supports apt, (eg Debian, RH, SuSE).
Standard libraries may seem like a good solution, but they would reduce some of the aspects that make Linux great. Anyway, good luck trying to co-ordinate all the different distros to use a standard set of libraries. Solutions are being developed. Have you heard of Autopackage?
Anyway I don't see this as such a big barrier, most desktop users never install software. And when they do it's a big fancy well known package that will probably come with a noarch rpm (Flash(tm) anyone?)