Showing messages 1 through 8 of 8.

• Bullseye!
  2003-11-14 10:35:20  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  You're totally right! It's a frequent mistake in marketing to look at the market leader, and assume you can catch up to him or surpass him by doing the same thing he's doing. It never works. Forget about trying to write open office for Linux. Even it worked perfectly like MS office, it would not increase the number of desktop Linux users.
  
  The only way to catch up is to aim to be number 2, and the number 2 solution always presents itself as *the alternative* to the number 1. It does this by emphasizing the ways it is opposite to the number 1, or not like the number 1. How is Linux not like Windows? No virsus? Install once, never patch? Brilliant people use Linux. Make people want to join that club with some hokey catch-phrase like, "Be brilliant. Use Linux."
  
  It's counter intuitive at first, but the only way to approach number 1 is to aim to be number 2.
• Bullseye!
  2003-11-14 19:41:07  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  That's just stupid.
  Sorry, without StarOffice / OpenOffice in the shape they are today (thanks be to Sun) there wouldn't be any point to any discussion about a push into the desktop area. Not now, not anytime soon.
  Munich, Largo FL, Burlington Industries, other public sector enterprises the world over plus thousands of United States government DoD desktops --forget about it. SO/OOo is why those stories exist. KDE / Gnome are NOT the killer app and are not the reason for these victories.

• Bullseye!
  2003-11-13 10:05:27  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  First off Linux is far from being a copycat of windows. It is largely derived from Unix (which windows has also 'borrowed' from on many occasions). KDE and GNOME on the other hand are very similar to Explorer (the windows GUI).
  
  "The new computing paradigm must so compelling... ", blah, blah. Are you serious? Has T-Mobile or Cingular redefined cellular service. No. People (and companies) switch vendors when they are unhappy with their product or found a way to save money. You must only provide a viable option. You are correct in that 3rd party vendors must support your platform but you might be surprised how many already do or how many windows compatible alternatives exist.
  
  The redirection you speak of such as new file systems leaves much to debate. As for upgrading the software with only changes to the GUI, what do you think XP was? New graphics, a small handful of new features, slower performance (compared to w2k) and ... oh wait, that's it.
  
  New direction will come but you must realize the computer age is still in it's infancy. We haven't even realized the potential of computing (much less implemented it). 30 years after the first home was available you still had to have an operator connect your call. Not exactly what I would call the peak of that technology.
  
  We are still going uphill and will be for a long time so sit back and enjoy the show.
  
  As for the $40B giant, just remember what happened to Ma Bell.
  
• Bullseye!
  2003-11-14 10:07:44  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  "Has T-Mobile or Cingular redefined cellular service. No. People (and companies) switch vendors when they are unhappy with their product or found a way to save money. You must only provide a viable option."
  
  Joe Schmo knows he's unhappy with his cell phone because his options (lower prices, new features, etc.) are advertised to him daily. He doesn't care that cellular digital technology gave him more options than wired analog service. He does know he can call his wired phone from his cell and vice versa; they are compatible. He knows he can do more, and is willing to pay for it.
  
  Unlike with cell phones, Joe doesn't know he is unhappy with his operating system. He doesn't even know what an OS is (that's why he can't tell you what version of Windows he's running) and certainly doesn't know how to replace it. Linux has not presented him with anything he can't already do with Windows. He doesn't care about open code because he'll never change it, just like he has never stopped his VCR from blinking "12:00". Linux may (or may not) be better technology, but until it offers a killer consumer app unavailable in Windows, he won't bother paying anyone to switch his OS. And the new one had better be compatible with his old applications.

• Bullseye!
  2003-11-13 08:51:38  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  I think that if projections are correct in that the next home computing wave is HTPC's....and since you can basically integrate TIVO, MP3, DVD, DVD Burn, FM/AM, cable TV, etc into one linux box....
  
  
  hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm..............
  
  thinking outside the box...........anyone with me?
• Bullseye!
  2003-11-14 02:53:32  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  Computers will disappear when the connectivity is there. Just plug in your terminal to the network like you would hook up your TV to the cable service. And who will care about the OS when it is all about the services you use. Phone companies give away mobile phones for free because the money is in the service you use. One big difference at this moment: MS Windows is a 95% or so monopoly at this is the Killer factor what linux does: it offers competition so it will offer choice for us (it even offers control)
• Bullseye!
  2003-11-13 10:37:51  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  Why not? Sony plans on doing a similar project... the DESR-5000 and 7000
  
  Info.. http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200310/03-1007E/
• Bullseye!
  2003-11-13 09:29:36  anonymous2 [View]
  
  
  could run afoul of digital rights management legislation but what the heck! I want to do it, perhaps others will too?