We've expanded our news coverage and improved our search! Visit
oreilly.com for the latest or search for all things across O'Reilly!
| Weblog: |
|
Long awaited Java releases from Apple
|
| Subject: |
|
Cheers |
| Date: |
|
2003-11-04 14:43:09 |
| From: |
|
anonymous2
|
Response to: Cheers
|
|
> .NET sucks as a safe (no forced exception handling)
So a language isn't safe if it doesn't *force* you into a particular model of error handling? That's a ludicrous statement! I guess you feel that almost all languages are unsafe then?
> easy-to-use (have you actually tried to USE delegates?)
What's hard about delegates? You define your delegate type like a regular method signature (but with the delegate keyword). Then than you can just go right ahead and create delegate instances, pass them around, and call them. I really can't see anything challenging there.
On second thought, if you find delegates difficult then perhaps that's why you need to program in a language that babysits your use of exceptions too. It probably is safer for you.
|