| Weblog: | Long awaited Java releases from Apple | |
| Subject: | Cheers | |
| Date: | 2003-11-03 06:59:46 | |
| From: | anonymous2 | |
|
Response to: Cheers
|
||
|
It's funny to me that this isn't more of a big deal. It's a marriage of the best darn GUI invented to the best darn language ever... and yet people like you make cracks about '5 guys' developing software with this incredible combination.
|
||
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.
| Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1. |




So a language isn't safe if it doesn't *force* you into a particular model of error handling? That's a ludicrous statement! I guess you feel that almost all languages are unsafe then?
> easy-to-use (have you actually tried to USE delegates?)
What's hard about delegates? You define your delegate type like a regular method signature (but with the delegate keyword). Then than you can just go right ahead and create delegate instances, pass them around, and call them. I really can't see anything challenging there.
On second thought, if you find delegates difficult then perhaps that's why you need to program in a language that babysits your use of exceptions too. It probably is safer for you.