advertisement

Subject:   Lawyers call SCO claims "bizarre" "ridiculous"
Date:   2003-09-03 07:53:55
From:   anonymous2
"'Still, legal experts last week said SCO's new legal tack may not stand up. "It's true that pre-emption is a valid defense," Ferguson said. "Whether or not that will carry any weight in court is somewhat suspect.""


Pre-emption would perhaps work if the GPL was trying to base itself on a state law, but it doesn't. The GPL is a way for an author to easily exercise the rights that USC-17-102 says the author has exclusive rights to grant. One of htem is the right to authorize reproduction ... and USC makes no mention of the terms of the granting - you could grant the right to a public performance of your play for no royalties under the condition that the performance be in the nude. It's legal.