We've expanded our news coverage and improved our search! Visit news.oreilly.com for the latest or search for all things across O'Reilly!
advertisement

Weblog:   Gartner's Advice on SCO, vs. the Real Story, per Netcraft
Subject:   SCO vs. Gartner
Date:   2003-08-03 07:19:56
From:   anonymous2
Response to: SCO vs. Gartner

> not because the infractions (assuming, as I do,
> that they exist) will directly affect Linux


Wow. I knew there was someone out there who thinks that TSG is right in their claims. It's interesting to finally run across you. I am very impressed that you are holding this line totally and completely alone. Especially now that it's been proven that Caldera was the entity that put the UNIX code into the Linux kernel.
Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.

  • SCO vs. Gartner
    2003-08-04 11:54:32  anonymous2 [Reply | View]

    Uh, where was it proven that? It can't be proven until SCO releases the names of the files or specific functions that it claims it held the copyright of, which they haven't done and claim they won't do until the case goes to court.
Showing messages 1 through 1 of 1.