We've expanded our news coverage and improved our search! Visit
oreilly.com for the latest or search for all things across O'Reilly!
| Weblog: |
|
Dan Gillmor on the Columbia
|
| Subject: |
|
re-engineering space flight |
| Date: |
|
2003-02-07 01:44:45 |
| From: |
|
anonymous2
|
|
|
|
Well as it stands at the moment every mission has around a 1% chance of catastrophic failure. To my way of thinking those are inhuman odds for any peacetime, voluntary activity.
The logical engineering route to get us to the planets and, hopefully one day, to the stars is to get the robotics right and then get the energy and materials processing right all the while improving the flight systems. It would seem reasonable to want a space taxi that's as safe as an airliner before we put people in it.
Can anyone honestly point to work on the ISS that needs doing and couldn't be done at a fraction of the cost without the people.
I don't wish to detract from the courage and the spirit of the shuttle and ISS crews but this whole business of chucking people into low Earth orbit and praying that they get back in one piece is becoming a bit grisly.
Festina Lente!
|