We've expanded our news coverage and improved our search! Visit
oreilly.com for the latest or search for all things across O'Reilly!
| Weblog: |
|
Should 'www' be retired?
|
| Subject: |
|
incoming links and search engines |
| Date: |
|
2003-01-26 04:10:04 |
| From: |
|
anonymous2
|
|
|
|
Leaving the technical questions (DNS, hosts, etc.) aside, I can see one good reason to use the www prefix: search engines.
Using URLs without www., I noticed that people adding links to your site prefix your URL out of habit, or maybe to make a "better" URL and do the site owner a "favour".
Now stupid search engines see two sites with each one counting for half of the incoming links, instead of one higher ranked site counting for all of the links.
As a consequence: when enabling both (or even more) URL variants, you should at least redirect the user (and the spiders!) to only one distinct host name.
Jens.
|